Skip to content

Veneers · Yousef B., 50s

The Second Opinion

Twelve crowns proposed elsewhere. Four onlays, two veneers and a night guard delivered instead.

Treatment
Veneers
Duration
3 months
Appointments
7 visits
Clinician
Dr. Yasmin Al-Rashed
The Second Opinion, completed

Patient Goal

What they came in for.

He came in holding a treatment plan for twelve full crowns and wanted to know whether it was necessary. He was not looking for a cheaper plan — he was looking for an honest one.

Patient Goal

Initial Condition

What we found.

Two cracked upper molars with visible mesiodistal fracture lines on transillumination, and a lower first molar with a large failing amalgam undermining both buccal cusps. The remaining eight teeth in the proposed plan had intact enamel, small sound composites and no cracks. Moderate anterior wear consistent with nocturnal bruxism, which nothing in the original plan addressed.

Initial Condition

Final Result

Where it finished.

Six restorations instead of twelve, at roughly a third of the total preparation volume. All four onlays functioning with no sensitivity at the twelve-month review. The eight untreated teeth are unchanged on comparison photography. The night guard shows the wear that would otherwise have gone into his enamel.

Final Result

Patient Experience

In their words.

He said the part that stayed with him was being shown the transillumination images and the crack lines on a screen — being able to see which teeth had a problem and which did not, rather than being asked to take it on trust.

Patient Experience

The plan, before anything started.

  1. Phase 01

    Reassessment

    Transillumination, bite analysis and selective anaesthesia to identify which teeth were genuinely symptomatic rather than simply restored.

  2. Phase 02

    Treat what is broken

    Bonded ceramic onlays on the three structurally compromised molars, plus one that showed early cracking.

  3. Phase 03

    Aesthetics, minimally

    Two veneers on the upper centrals to address the visible wear, rather than crowning eight intact teeth.

  4. Phase 04

    Address the cause

    A milled occlusal guard, which was the missing element in the original plan and the reason the wear had occurred.

  5. Phase 05

    Monitor

    The remaining teeth photographed and charted for comparison at six-monthly recalls.

Treatment process

What actually happened, in order.

  1. Visit 1

    Full reassessment with transillumination and a bite analysis. Six of the twelve proposed teeth had no clinical finding to justify a crown.

  2. Visit 2

    Two upper molar onlays prepared, scanned, milled and bonded the same day. Preparation depth roughly a third of what a full crown would have required.

  3. Visit 3

    Lower first molar onlay. The failing amalgam was removed and the remaining walls proved sound enough to keep.

  4. Visit 4

    Fourth onlay on the tooth showing early crack propagation, treated preventively rather than after it split.

  5. Visits 5 — 6

    Two veneers on the upper centrals at 0.3mm preparation, designed to restore the worn incisal edges without changing his tooth character.

  6. Visit 7

    Milled night guard fitted and adjusted. Baseline photographs taken of the eight teeth we did not treat.

The same mouth.

Photographed under identical lighting, 3 months apart

The Second Opinion before treatment
The Second Opinion after treatment
Before After
12 → 6
Restorations proposed vs placed
8
Healthy teeth left alone
1
Cause finally addressed

Technology used

What it took.

  • Transillumination crack detection
  • CEREC same-day milling
  • IPS e.max onlays
  • Digital bite analysis
  • Milled occlusal guard

Every item here is in the building. See how it is used.

Start your own

Every case here began with one hour.

An examination, your own images on screen, and a written plan with a price. Whether you proceed is a separate decision, made later.

Or call +965 2242 8800 — Sunday to Thursday, 9:00 to 20:00.